| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1032.1 | naught.e.cipher, but cipher.ne.naught | VAXUUM::T_PARMENTER | Human. All too human. | Mon Mar 22 1993 05:55 | 6 | 
|  |     Well, "naught" takes me back to the second grade.  That's what we
    called the zero.
    
    How about Jean-Paul Sartre's great philosophical work, "Being and
    Naughtiness"?
    
 | 
| 1032.2 | Big zilch | FSOA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/L87 DTN 297-3200 | Mon Mar 22 1993 10:28 | 1 | 
|  |     Should we sigh for the cipher..... NOT!
 | 
| 1032.3 | "My name is 'Noman'" said Odysseus | TLE::JBISHOP |  | Mon Mar 22 1993 12:48 | 13 | 
|  |     Speaking of "nothing" and "no thing":
    
    1.	A cream-cheese sandwich is better than nothing.
    
    2.	Nothing is better than eternal happiness.
    
    Therefore
    
    3.	A cream-cheese sandwich is better than eternal happiness.
    
    Wherein lies the error?
    
    		-John Bishop
 | 
| 1032.4 | Just trying to be helpful | KERNEL::MORRIS | Which universe did you dial? | Tue Mar 23 1993 04:49 | 12 | 
|  |     The error is in the statement "A cream-cheese sandwich is better than
    nothing".
    
    If you wanted something to eat, a cream-cheese sandwich is as good as
    nothing. :o)
    
    
    How about the old advertising slogan (to close the infinite loop!):
    
    "Nothing acts faster than Anadin".... so take nothing?
    
    Jon
 | 
| 1032.5 | mmmmm by way of nothing... | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | Bushies do it for FREE! | Sun Mar 28 1993 23:44 | 13 | 
|  |     G'day,
    
    Butthen...
    Cows are not crows
    Crows are not purple
    
    therefore cows are (not (not purple))
    therefore cows are purple...
    
    
    derrr
    
    derek
 | 
| 1032.6 |  | JIT081::DIAMOND | Pardon me? Or must I be a criminal? | Mon Mar 29 1993 00:01 | 3 | 
|  |     Some notes are perfectly logical.
    1032.* are some notes.
    Therefore 1032.* are perfectly logical.
 | 
| 1032.7 |  | GIDDAY::BURT | Chele Burt - CSC Sydney, DTN 7355693 | Mon Mar 29 1993 17:31 | 3 | 
|  | >>>    Therefore 1032.* are perfectly logical.
Logically perfect?
 |