| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 894.1 | as in Proving Grounds | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Tue Jun 25 1991 18:37 | 0 | 
| 894.2 | Hey, it's a joke -- get it? | SHALOT::ANDERSON | Not Sold in Stores | Wed Jun 26 1991 22:24 | 6 | 
|  | 	Hey, who said English (or language in general) makes perfect
	logical sense all the time.  Richard Lederer has a list of
	stuff like this -- I'll see if I can find it.  In the meantime,
	though, "I could care less" springs to mind.
		-- C
 | 
| 894.3 |  | JIT081::DIAMOND | This note is illegal tender. | Thu Jun 27 1991 04:35 | 1 | 
|  |     So, does a rolling ACCVIO test the test or prove the proof?
 | 
| 894.4 | Nice job! | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN |  | Fri Jun 28 1991 00:46 | 8 | 
|  |     Re: .0
    
    Thanks for the lucid analysis.  I always thought the expression "the
    exception proves the rule" to be glib, but I could never express my
    reasons very clearly.  It made more sense to me to say that the
    exception _disproves_ the rule; thanks to your analysis I know why.
    
    Bernie
 | 
| 894.5 | As an ex-mathematician... | PAOIS::HILL | Another migrant worker! | Fri Jun 28 1991 09:05 | 14 | 
|  |        My first encounter with "the exception proves the rule" came in 
       solving mathematical problems.
    
       When trying to establish, for example, the co-ordinate geometry 
       formula to describe a curve we would be told,  "the formula is 
       correct if it accomodates all the exceptional circumstances."
    
       This generally meant testing validity for things like:
    
       	 x = 0	x = infinity
       	 y = 0  y = infinity
    
       If the exceptions worked then we could safely conclude with "the 
       exceptions prove the rule".
 | 
| 894.6 | stretching the rules | CPDW::GOFF |  | Thu Jun 18 1992 15:37 | 4 | 
|  |     I've never been comfortable with this expression either. I guessed that
    it was related to the expression "there's an exception to every rule".
    If you found an exception then you met a necessary condition for the 
    existance of a rule. 
 | 
| 894.7 |  | PAOIS::HILL | An immigrant in Paris | Fri Jun 19 1992 01:59 | 6 | 
|  |     Re .6
    
    If you'd left another 10 days before making your entry you could have
    wished .5 a Happy 1st Birthday
    
    :-)
 |