| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1008.1 |  | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Dec 06 1990 20:35 | 4 | 
|  | Two things about this struck me as strange.  I thought I read something about
a hit list found in Nosair's possession.  Somebody who has a hit list doesn't
sound like a good risk for bail.  I'd also think that he'd be safer in jail
than on the streets.
 | 
| 1008.2 | bail suspended | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Dec 07 1990 19:16 | 4 | 
|  | From today's paper:
New York (AP) -
A judge suspended a $300,000 bail yesterday for a man accused of killing
extremist Rabbi Meir Kahane and set new bail arguments for Monday.
 | 
| 1008.3 | and | TAV02::FEINBERG | Don Feinberg | Sun Dec 09 1990 12:51 | 10 | 
|  | 
	Even more strange:
	He pleaded "not guilty".  What was the explanation?
	He (an Arab) is a *supporter* of Kahane's, and came to support
	him.  He stood by Kahane, who he admired very much, while
	"this guy in a yarmulke came and shot Kahane..."
d
 | 
| 1008.4 | .....if the trial starts....... | TAVIS::BARUCH | in the land of milk and honey | Mon Dec 10 1990 08:37 | 11 | 
|  | 
>        He (an Arab) is a *supporter* of Kahane's, and came to support
>        him.  He stood by Kahane, who he admired very much, while
>        "this guy in a yarmulke came and shot Kahane..."
Don,  IF (?) he comes to trial, this sounds like the start of a good 
insanity plea!  :-)
Shalom
Baruch
 | 
| 1008.5 | Gotta prove it, baby...you gotta prove it! | DECALP::SHRAGER | Jack of MATCHED trades | Tue Dec 11 1990 16:39 | 22 | 
|  | IF RATHOLE_WARNING is true
  THEN
	RE: .0	"...the murderer of..."
	The American system of justice, while perhaps lacking in
	a few ways, is one of the best in the world.  The system,
	simply stated, is that this chap is innocent until *proven*
	guilty.
	RE: .3 "...pleaded not guilty..."
	In the American system the fact that A shoots (and kills) B
	doesn't necessarily make A guilty of first degree murder.
  ELSE
Several friends (and family) of mine are lawyers (definition:  One skilled
in circumventing the law :-) and often quote the "A does it to B" example
as the flunk-out question used in the first year of law school.
  ENDIF
 |