| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 448.1 | for what its worth. | WOODRO::SAADEH | Will there ever be peace over there | Tue Apr 12 1988 16:22 | 16 | 
|  | Hello 43322::Levy,
	Maybe what we are seeing here is a act of goodwill on the
	part of the PLO and ARaFAT.  I feel that he is doing the right
	thing by trying to help Kuwait with this critical situation.
	The best bet was to storm the plane and hope for survivors from
	minute it landed on Cypriot terroritory.  Kuwait has a right to
	hold talks, they elected not to come down to the HIjackers level.
        One must realize that these HIjackers have excused life and chose
        to create havoc for the innocent.
        Open and shut case.
Good day,
-Sultan
 | 
| 448.2 | could be a (dangerous!) family affair | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | Follow flock, become lampchop | Tue Apr 12 1988 21:49 | 6 | 
|  |     Without any particular knowledge of the details, I note that the
    hijackers want release of a particular group of  prisoners.l  There
    have been a number of terroroist acts by the relatives of these
    17, who are doing time for trying to blow up the US embassy.
    This isn't PLO, it's a blood feud between a family and the rest
    of the world...
 | 
| 448.3 |  | CIRCUS::KOLLING | Karen, Sweetie, Holly; in Calif. | Wed Apr 13 1988 12:35 | 25 | 
|  | 
    The PLO is well situated to be an intermediary in this situation
    because it has the trust of all three parties involved -- Kuwait,
    the hijackers, and Cyprus.  Kuwait has a large population of
    Palestinian exiles and is a strong supporter of the PLO.  The hijackers
    appear to be from one of the groups operating in Lebanon which the
    military branch of the PLO has been allied with from time to time.
    The PLO negotiators seem to be mainly from the PLO diplomatic
    delegation to Cyprus;  I believe the PLO ambassador was actually
    involved in the discussions at one point.  Humanitarian grounds
    aside, it's in the PLO's interest to bring this to a conclusion
    because it takes attention away from the Palestinian uprising and
    fosters the image of Arabs as terrorists.  I'm a little fuzzy about
    the details here, but something similar happened in a Palestinian
    refugee camp in Lebanon a few weeks ago -- my recollection is that
    Abu Nidal's people had captured a couple of westerners who were
    taking pictures of Nidal's people, and the other camp people made
    Nidal's men release them.
    
    The PLO has acted as an intermediary in other situations in
    the past, for example for the United States in Lebanon before
    and during the 1976 evacuation.
    
                        
 | 
| 448.4 |  | PLDVAX::PKANDAPPAN |  | Fri Apr 15 1988 12:36 | 16 | 
|  | As Karen pointed out, this is not the first time that the PLO has played a
mediating role; before being forced out of Beirut, the PLO apparently had
a 'strong relationship' with the US agencies and helped resolve 'several
problems the US had in Lebanon'!
Yasser Arafat has picked up a deadly quarrel with the Khomeini regime by
directly accusing them of masterminding the hijacking. So I doubt that the
PLO had anything to do with this other than playing a negotiators' role.
The PLO has a large delegation in Cyprus; and deadly 'games' go on there
between them and the Israelis - three people whom the PLO accused of being
Mossad agents (a charge denied by Israel) were killed by PLO members a few years
back; three top level PLO officials were killed by a car bomb in what was
claimed to be an Israeli attempt to stop the sailing of the PLO chartered ship.
-parthi
 |