| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 379.1 | Moshiach | CURIE::FEINBERG | Don Feinberg | Tue Sep 29 1987 15:53 | 94 | 
|  |     I'm  giving  below a  copy  of  a  short list I wrote some  time
    ago  on  MY view  of  what  Jews  believe  about  the  Messiah
    (Moshiach).  Unfortunately, I'm not  really  a  scholar,  and  I  cannot
    represent  this  to  be  totally  complete.   It  is  the result of some
    scholarship I've personally been exposed to.  I'm responsible for faults
    and omissions.
    That said, here goes:
    We believe that the ultimate  goal  of  history  is  the  perfection  of
    society.   Since  everything  was created by G-d, all must eventually be
    perfected.  This is even true of our everyday world, which  was  created
    as  a  place  for our service to G-d.  You could call this ultimate goal
    the "Messianic Age".  The coming of the Messiah is  a  basic  belief  of
    Judaism.
    1.  We believe that G-d is eternal, above and beyond time.   G-d  cannot
        be born, He cannot die, nor can He be divided into sections.
        The Messiah is not G-d.  He will be a human being, born naturally to
        husband  and  wife.   Tanach  says that the Messiah will be a direct
        descendant of King David.  He will reign as the King of the Jews.
        The Torah clearly states in many places that our  laws  are  eternal
        and  will  never  be  abolished.   So,  the  Messiah will definitely
        conform to Torah law in his own behavior and teaching.  For example,
        observances  of  Kashrus  (the Kosher laws), Sabbath, Rosh Hashanah,
        Yom Kippur, Pesach, Sukkos, Shavuos, etc., etc., which  are  clearly
        spoken  of  in  Torah,  will  continue to be made in the time of the
        Messiah, as they are today.
    2.  The majority of Jews will have to return to their homeland (Israel),
        in  a non-miraculous way, _before_ the Messiah comes.
        Before the Messiah, the prophet Elijah will come.  And  the  Messiah
        himself will be a prophet.  But there's a teaching that prophecy can
        only exist in the Land of Israel, and then only when the majority of
        Jews  live  there.  So the ingathering of Jews must occur before the
        Messiah will come.
        During the time of the Messiah, prophecy will return to  the  Jewish
        people, and the presence of G-d will be among us.  See Ezek.  37.27:
        "And after that I will pour my spirit on all  of  mankind  and  your
        sons and daughters will prophesy."
    3.  There is a tradition that the Holy Temple must be rebuilt before the
        the  Messiah  comes.   But  there's  also a tradition that Jerusalem
        cannot be rebuilt before the ingathering of  the  Diaspora.   It  is
        possible that the Messiah could accomplish those things before he is
        recognized for who he is.
    4.  In Prophets (Isaiah 45 and Zefaniah 3) it says that when the Messiah
        comes,  all  the  nations of the world will unite to acknowledge and
        worship the one true G-d.  "The  knowledge  of  G-d  will  fill  the
        earth.   The  world  will be filled with the knowledge of G-d as the
        waters cover the seas (Isaiah 11.9)."
    5.  The Torah says that when  the  Messiah  comes,  his  influence  will
        extend  over  all  people.   They  will worship G-d at the Temple in
        Jerusalem.  It's said, "...for my house will  become  the  house  of
        prayer  for all nations".  This does NOT mean that everyone will all
        be Jews, rather that everyone will recognize G-d.
    6.  In order for the perfect society of the Messianic Age to exist, such
        things as disease will have to be eliminated.  Thus (as Isaiah 35.5)
        "The eyes of the blind will be opened, the ears of the deaf shall be
        unstopped; then shall the lame man leap as a hart, and the tongue of
        the dumb shall sing."
    7.  During the time of the Messiah, a new spirit will  rule  the  world.
        People  will  stop committing sins and crimes.  This will especially
        apply to Jews.  Tanach says (Deut.  30.6) "G-d will circumcise  your
        heart  and  the  heart of your children to love G-d.".  (From Isaiah
        60.21) "And your people are all righteous,  they  will  inherit  the
        earth  forever."  (From Jeremiah 50.20) "In that day I will seek the
        sins of Israel and there will be none." (From Ezek.  36.21) "I  will
        give  you  a  new heart and a new spirit - and you will obey my laws
        and commandments and do them."
    8.  One of the Messiah's major tasks is to bring  peace  to  the  entire
        world.   In  the  time of the Messiah, there are to be no more wars,
        and the manufacture of arms will stop.  See Isaiah 2.4:   "And  they
        shall  beat  their  swords  into  plowshares,  and their spears into
        pruning hooks.  Nation  shall  not  lift  up  sword  agains  nation,
        neither shall they learn war any more."
    9.  We believe that  the  Messiah,  despite  his  impressive  abilities,
        cannot  take  away  our sins.  It's an important Torah position that
        each person is responsible for, and punished  for  his  sins  alone:
        "The soul that sinneth it shall die." "Sons will not be punished for
        the sins of their fathers." According to the Torah, each person must
        return  to  G-d.   Each  person  must change their own ways and seek
        G-d's forgiveness.
 | 
| 379.2 | And for a slightly different view... | CSCMA::SEIDMAN | Aaron Seidman | Tue Sep 29 1987 19:22 | 37 | 
|  | Don provided a good summary of the Orthodox view of messianism, which has
been a major component of Jewish thought since the Babylonian exile,
although quite a few of the ideas he listed represent medieval development
of these basic ideas.  (We've worked on this a lo-o-ong time :^) )
I am not sure if he provided direct answers to all your questions, so
I thought I'd supplement his response.
>      1) Can someone outline the major "requirements" of Meshiach?
	Don's essay provides a good summary of traditional views.
      2) Assuming that you don't believe Jesus to be Meshiach, 
	 why don't you?
	One of the most basic reasons is that he died.  Furthermore,
	he died without (from the standpoint of Jewish messianic theory)
	accomplishing anything.                                
      3) How will you recognize Meshiach when He comes?
	By what he does.
      4) Does Jewish theology necessitate that Meshiach be G_d 
	 incarnate (as does fundamentalist Christianity)?
	As Don pointed out, Jewish belief denies that the messiah will
	be divine.
      5) Is "Meshiach" an office or a man (i.e., can there be 
	 a "string" of Meshaichs over a period of time)?
	The traditional view, as Don pointed out, is that the messiah
	will be a man.  Non-Orthodox views include the idea that the
	messiah and the messianic age are ideals for which we strive
	not literal historical happenings to be anticipated.
 | 
| 379.3 | A request for clarification, and thanks | DYO780::SCHAFER | Dragons is *so* stupid ... | Wed Sep 30 1987 11:51 | 20 | 
|  | RE: .1,.2
   Thanks.  This is really helping me out. 
   I do have a few other questions, though, if you don't mind. 
   How will you recognize Elijah? 
   How will you verify that the one claiming to be the Messiah (sorry,
   these Jewish spellings are too much for my American mind to handle) is
   really of the lineage of David?  Is there some historical record
   somewhere? 
   I think .2 stated that Jesus (Yeshua ben Yosef) was not Messiah
   because he died?  The Messiah is then supposed to be immortal? I don't
   understand this at all. 
   Thanks again. 
brad
 | 
| 379.4 | Is the world perfect? | IAGO::SCHOELLER | Caught in an information firestorm | Wed Sep 30 1987 13:12 | 22 | 
|  | < Note 379.3 by DYO780::SCHAFER "Dragons is *so* stupid ..." >
RE: .3
    Shalom Brad,
>   How will you verify that the one claiming to be the Messiah (sorry,
>   these Jewish spellings are too much for my American mind to handle) is
>   really of the lineage of David?  Is there some historical record
>   somewhere? 
    No historical record.  Very tough problem   8^{)  .  My guess is, if
    he is successful then he is of the lineage of David.  If not, who cares?
>   I think .2 stated that Jesus (Yeshua ben Yosef) was not Messiah
>   because he died?  The Messiah is then supposed to be immortal? I don't
>   understand this at all.
    The problem is that he is gone and things are far from perfect.
    L'hitraot,
    Gavriel
 | 
| 379.5 | This is not an interesting topic? | DYO780::SCHAFER | Dragons is *so* stupid ... | Thu Oct 01 1987 13:17 | 10 | 
|  | RE: all
   Thank you for the answers so far - but frankly, I am surprised that
   there have not been more responses. 
   Does anyone care about Messiah?  Does anyone expect him to come soon? 
   Still asking questions ...
brad
 | 
| 379.6 | We all hope soon | ISTG::MAGID |  | Thu Oct 01 1987 13:58 | 8 | 
|  |     Brad, I might suggest a good reference on the subject.
    
    The 2 volume set of "The Jewish Book of Why" 
    
    It spends about 10 informative pages explaining the DIFFERENT
    philosophies about the subject.
    
    I personally believe that it will be an "AGE" not a person
 | 
| 379.7 | Q: Title 379.5  A: Correct! | GRECO::FRYDMAN |  | Thu Oct 01 1987 15:30 | 14 | 
|  |     Brad, 
    
    Most Jews don't spend their time thinking and wondering about
    Moishiach...they expend their spiritual effort doing mitzvot (the
    commandments)...all of which bring them closer to G-d. 
    
    Moishiach will come when we are ready.
    
    Ani ma amim, b amunah shlemo ,bevias ha moishiach...
    			--#12 Rambam's Foundations of Faith
    
    ---Av
    
 | 
| 379.8 |  | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ |  | Thu Oct 01 1987 16:15 | 55 | 
|  |        re .5:
       
       > ...but frankly, I am surprised that there have not been more
       > responses. 
       
       Some people might expect that you would investigate books, as
       suggested by .6, which would surely be as definitive as at least
       some of the information from respondants here. 
       
       Others might respectfully decline to answer your queries after
       reading some of your previous contributions in other conferences.
       Although your questions (and subsequent replies) in this topic
       have indeed been civil, at least one note written under your name
       describes Jews (and any other group that does not view Jesus as
       you do) as being satanist and deriving their power from satan.
       Specifically: 
       
================================================================================
                 MIDAS""::JUNGLE:[MIREIDER.NOTES]CHRISTIAN.NOT;1
 DYO780::SCHAFER          Doing all for Christ's Glory        30-OCT-1985 15:09
 Note 88.23              Trick or Treat or Christianity               23 of 24
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       ...
            There are two sources of power in the universe.  The greater
     power is that of God, who is unlimited, unbounded, eternal, etc. 
     The lesser power is that of Satan, who is not even close to God
     in power, and only operates in the context provided for him by
     God. 
	"He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not
	gather with me, scatters" (quoting Jesus in Luke 11:23).
     Neither Hindus nor Buddhists nor "pagans" nor [fill in the
     blank] acknowledge Jesus as the Messiah - the Anointed One, the
     Son of God.
	"Every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from
	God." (1 John 4:3) 
     Technically, then, every group that does not derive its power
     from God must derive its power from the devil and is therefore
     satanist.  
     ...  
================================================================================       
       Now, please don't misinterpret me -- I don't suggest for a moment
       that gentiles ought not contribute to this conference, or that
       they ought not ask questions here.  I am suggesting, though, that
       your opinion that Jews derive their power from satan would offend
       a large portion of the Jewish community.  I can't speak for anyone
       else in this conference, but I would imagine that it's not
       inconceiveable that inquiries from individuals who have made such
       statements might not be warmly received in this forum. 
       
       --Don Topaz 
 | 
| 379.9 | I'm beginning to see more clearly | BRAT::PULKSTENIS |  | Fri Oct 02 1987 13:02 | 61 | 
|  |     re: .8, MR_TOPAZ,
    
    Thank you, Don, for entering that, and for your gracious reply.
    
    My better judgement suggests that I should wait to review my notes
    at home before I reply, but I seem to be unable to shake off my
    impetuousness, so...
    
    Forgive me (I've been saying that a lot lately!) if all my facts 
    are not exactly correct, or if I offend anyone, Jew or Christian
    [help me coin a new word, please :-)]. I just want to be very
    careful, and fair.
    
    It would be fair to note that this entry of Brad's is from 1985,
    quite old. People change. I did! Perhaps Brad, too, has changed
    his perspective and may tell us how he feels today.
    
    Now, this is from *my* new perspective: It is this kind of 
    Christian (mis)understanding and (mis)use of scripture that does 
    both Jews and Christians a great disservice.
    
    What is so difficult is that we mortals feel we *have* to
    fully understand and define the infinite God, and of necessity 
    we have to try to do so in very finite terms. Oviously, we 
    fall short.
    
    Because most Christians have a one-sided perspective [a natural
    and understandable, but avoidable, state], what they take as
    God's word in the New Testament is often quoted from a strictly
    Christian perspective (which, I'm learning, is incomplete).
    
    God has never, nor will he ever, abandon the Jews! They are,
    and always will be, near and dear to His heart. They are an
    integral part of His plan. The Bible is very clear on this.
    I'm not sure who's muddled the issue...
    
    The concept that Jews who are outside of God and therefore
    of Satan is *absolutely contradictory* to God's word and
    His promises. 
    
    Christians seem to fall into the mistaken notion that since
    Jews do not recognize Jesus as Christ, God has formed a "new
    covenant" with Christians, turning His back on the "sinful
    Jewish people". 
    
    In fact, the proper Christian perspective is (should be) 
    to recognize that the new covenant God established is with 
    His people -- *the Jews* -- and that we Christians, by His 
    mercy, are the wild olive that God has grafted in.
    
    Now, I realize I'm into an area of theology here where our two
    groups differ greatly. It's not my purpose to debate the correctness
    or wrongness of either. I am content to respect and accept our 
    differences, and I present the above only as clarification and 
    support of my stand relative to the material presented in .8.
                        
    Humbled and still learning,
           
    Irena
    
    
 | 
| 379.10 | Hopefully clearing a misunderstanding | DYO780::SCHAFER | Dragons is *so* stupid ... | Mon Oct 05 1987 16:24 | 34 | 
|  | RE: .8
   Ok - I'll call you Mr. Topaz (as opposed to Don  8-) ... 
   I think you've taken the statement a bit out of context.  As I
   remember it, I was referring to the occult, as the topic was about
   Halloween.  I suppose there are occultists who are of Jewish origin;
   there are also (many more) occultists of gentile origin. 
   I was not saying /did not mean to say /will not ever say that all
   Jewish people derive(d) their "power from Satan".  That would be
   totally absurd. 
   Think you can forgive me on that one, Do - er, Mr. Topaz?  And thanks
   for the remark about me being "civil".  I *am* trying to tone down
   these days.  8-)
Back to the topic at hand ...
   I have read some books - a rather large one, in particular published
   by a Mr. Abrahms (can't remember the full name right off the top of my
   head).  The fellow was a rabbinical type whose frame of reference
   was/is so far removed my own that I couldn't really see where he was
   coming from. 
   As I said before, while I feel I pretty much understand the Law at
   face value, I do NOT understand the traditions built up around that
   Law, or what implications they might have on the current Jewish
   perspective on the Messiah.  I'm simply trying to understand what you
   do (and don't) believe about him. 
   Thank you for your understanding. 
8^)
 | 
| 379.11 | Jewish-Christian differences | CSCMA::SEIDMAN | Aaron Seidman | Mon Oct 05 1987 20:23 | 52 | 
|  | re: .10
>   As I said before, while I feel I pretty much understand the Law at
>   face value, I do NOT understand the traditions built up around that
>   Law, or what implications they might have on the current Jewish
>   perspective on the Messiah.  I'm simply trying to understand what you
>   do (and don't) believe about him. 
There are at least two problems that you have to deal with:
	1.  In every religious group, there are the texts and then there
are the authoritative interpretations of the text.  For instance, the earliest
texts we have of the Bible (from the Dead Sea Scrolls) are unvowelled and un-
punctuated and some copies of certain books differ from other copies of
the same books.  Once you decide which text is authoritative, then you have
to vocalize and punctuate it to determine what it says.  There are places
where changing the vowel changes the meaning.  The Jewish tradition selected
texts that differ slightly (but sometimes significantly) from the Christian
version.  In addition, the Jews added a second set of texts, known in its
edited form as the Mishnah, which are considered as authoritative as the
Bible, although not in exactly the same way.  Christians have a somewhat
parallel situation with the Christian scriptures. 
	Thus, to understand Judaism you have to deal with the fact that
Jews and Christians differ in both the basic texts they use (although there
are some large areas of overlap) and in the way they interpret and emphasize
those texts.
	2.  There is a difference in emphasis on belief and action that
grows, in part, out of the coincidence of ethnicity and religion in Judaism.
One of the central ideas is that Jews, regardless of genetics, are one people.
If you are born a Jew, you don't become non-Jewish by not believing in
something.  To convert, you don't so much profess a belief (although that
is part of the ritual) as swear allegiance to the Jewish people.  As Av
pointed out (.7?), we don't spend very much time worrying about when/if
the/a Messiah (-->from the Heb., Mashiach=anointed) will come.  The important
thing is what we have to DO today.   We argue long and passionately with
each other about the right way to do things, but we rarely debate beliefs.
It is not that we don't have beliefs, but rather that the verbal profession
of a particular belief is not, with rare exceptions, a key element of Judaism.
	Looking at it from a different angle, Jews often have great difficulty
understanding, for example, Christian debates about Trinitarian doctrine
or discussions of Satanism--our frame of reference is so different that,
except when we think you [generic 'you'] are being anti-Semitic, we
find it hard to believe you're serious.
	If you can get past these two problems, you've made a start.
	Whew! I didn't intend to be so verbose!
					Aaron
 | 
| 379.12 | Know your language! | TAV02::NITSAN | set profile/personal_name="set profile/personal_name= | Wed Oct 07 1987 05:18 | 13 | 
|  | From the linguistic point of view:
----------------------------------
In the past they used to "crown" a new king by pouring oil/ointment
on him (on his head?). My Hebrew-English dictionary says "Anointing".
This action called in Hebrew "Li'mshoch" from the verb "Mashach" (sounds
similar to the Hebrew word used for "to pull", but with "Het" rather than
"Chaf" in the end. Other related Hebrew words are: "Mishcha" (paste/ointment),
and ..."Mashiach" (the one to be 'anointed').
The rest of the English/International terms are derived from this Hebrew verb.
/Nitsan
 |