| Title: | ase | 
| Moderator: | SMURF::GROSSO | 
| Created: | Thu Jul 29 1993 | 
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 2114 | 
| Total number of notes: | 7347 | 
I have a customer who has set up 3 networks on each node of his DECsafe cluster. ( one FDDI and 2 ethernet). This set up is designed to spread the newtork load over 3 different networks. Each user connects to the same alias i.e. Network 1 connects to foo 1.1.1.1 Network 2 connects to foo 1.1.2.1 Network 1 connects to foo 1.1.3.1 The customer wants to be able to use the same alias ( foo) when the services are switched over to another node. I am sure that this is possible but I do not have a cluster to try it. I will be on site this Saturday doing it and I would rather know exactly how to do it before going on site. Can anyone help.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1868.1 | No, ... | BACHUS::DEVOS | Manu Devos DEC/SI Brussels 856-7539 | Fri Feb 07 1997 09:29 | 8 | 
|     Hello Paul,
    
    If you have three networks, you must have three alias names foo1, foo2
    and foo3. It is not possible to associate three different addresses to
    a single alias name.
    
    Regards, Manu
    
 | |||||
| 1868.2 | Should be possible... | UTROP1::MAAT_R | Fri Feb 07 1997 14:13 | 19 | |
|     If I understand .0 well, the foo definitions are different on each
    network. Tricky! Wouldn't want to be responsible for maintaining them.
    
    If the fail-over node also has three netwerk interfaces, I see no
    reason why they could not be assigned those aliases too in case of a
    failover. This can be tried manually by issuing:
    	ifconfig tu0 (or ln0, or fta0...) alias a.b.c.d
    on the fail-over node, for each interface concerned. The same command
    with -alias will remove them.
    
    If this works it can be incorporated in a user script, along with a
    ping check to find out if the aliases are defined anywhere else on the
    network.
    
    
    But perhaps I did not understand the question in .0 right.
    
    
    				Rob
 | |||||