| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1861.1 | Not a legal character (by RFC) | JANIX::jmh | sendmail: The Vietnam of Berkeley | Wed Feb 05 1997 14:42 | 17 |
| >>Notefile: SMURF::ASE
>>Note: 1861.0
>>Author: SALEM::HARRIS_M
>>Topic: Memory Channel node name with underscores?
>>Date: 5-FEB-1997 12:26
>> I heard thru the grapevine (Not sure if it was true) that using an
>> _ (underscore in the memory channel node name) may cause problems with
>> the ASE cluster? Has anyone encountered this as a problem?
Underscores should not be used in host/domain names at all ...
In some RFC (the number escaped me) mentions them as not to be
used characters .
- Jan
|
| 1861.2 | Is it legal? - I don't know ... | VIRGIN::SUTTER | Who are you ??? - I'm BATMAN !!! | Thu Feb 06 1997 05:29 | 12 |
| cmon had a problem with underscores in hostnames since the cluster map
used them as separators.
I think this problem is fixed in the latest releases and there are patches
for the old ones.
I don't know wether it is legal to have underscores in hostnames (I think
it is).
Regards,
Arnold
|
| 1861.3 | RFC952 | JANIX::jmh | sendmail: The Vietnam of Berkeley | Mon Feb 10 1997 01:38 | 14 |
| >>Notefile: SMURF::ASE
>>Note: 1861.2
>>Author: VIRGIN::SUTTER "Who are you ??? - I'm BATMAN !!!"
>>Topic: Memory Channel node name with underscores?
>>Title: Is it legal? - I don't know ...
>>I don't know wether it is legal to have underscores in hostnames (I think
>>it is).
As per RFC952 no underscores should be used in hostnames.
Bind from version 4.9.4 onwards will check for illegal
hostnames and considers the zone to have a syntax error.
- Jan
|
| 1861.4 | What problems would show up, using underscores? | SALEM::HARRIS_M | | Thu Feb 13 1997 12:46 | 9 |
|
Now that I know we shouldn't be using _ in node names. Are there any
known errors/bugs that would arise because of the using of under-scores
in the Hostname, for either the machine itself or for say the memory
channel hostname.
Thanks,
Matt
|
| 1861.5 | cluster_cnx | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | John McDonald | Mon Mar 31 1997 12:04 | 8 |
| If an underscore is not a legal character, why does the Trucluster
installation automatically insert a node name called 'cluster_cnx'
into the hosts file?
John McDonald
Atlanta CSC
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
| 1861.6 | This hased been filed as a QAR | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | Gregory P. Myrdal | Wed Apr 02 1997 14:02 | 7 |
|
This problem has been filed as QAR 46932 (unfortunately since
June 1996). I am requesting that this be resolved in the next
release.
-- Greg
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
| 1861.7 | Will be fixed in wave 4 | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | Gregory P. Myrdal | Thu Apr 03 1997 09:59 | 16 |
| Hi,
I did a little more research on this topic and found out that the QAR
and the problem has been scheduled to be fixed in the wave 4 release.
It is incorrect (I assume simply because someone not being familiar
to rfc952) but since it does not seem to effecting anyone a fix in
wave 4 appears to be adequate.
BTW, a new install could change the cluster_cnx to a another name
if they wanted. The reason that this is not being investigated
for wave35 is that rolling upgrade causes problems. Ie. its not
seamless. If there were problems as a result of this, engineering
is willing to look further into the problem.
-- Greg
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|