| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1400.1 | | REQUE::BOWER | Peter Bower, ObjectBroker | Wed May 14 1997 08:34 | 11 |
| Set a break at the dispatcher to see if it ever gets there. The BCA08
value appears to be larger than any address in obb$shr.
Could you get the IDL and IML for the operation/method in question.
Can you have the customer run the image in the debugger and get the
output from the debugger when the crash occurs
show image
show calls
|
| 1400.2 | | RULLE::KLASSON | Sven-Olof Klasson @GOO | Wed May 14 1997 10:33 | 74 |
| Hi,
> Set a break at the dispatcher to see if it ever gets there. The BCA08
> value appears to be larger than any address in obb$shr.
Sorry, I may be incorrect about offset BCA08. I got this from a ACCVIO message
on fax. BCA08 was the "rel PC" value, that might be something diffrent than offset
Here is more complete information when the method server crashes (type from a fax)
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00
vitual address=00000002, PC=0069AA08, PS=0000001B
%TRACE-F-TRACEBACK, symbolic trace back follows
Image Name Module Name Routine Name Line Number rel PC abs PC
OBB$SHR 0 000BCA08 0069AA08
OBB$SHR 0 000BC864 0069A864
OBB$SHR 0 000B9F80 00697F80
.....
> Could you get the IDL and IML for the operation/method in question.
I'll ask the customer to send this to me.
> Can you have the customer run the image in the debugger and get the
> output from the debugger when the crash occurs
>
> show image
> show calls
The customer has allready run this in the debugger. I got the "show stack"
output. It's on a fax, and several pages long. I'll type the values for
"Entry Address:" here in hope this could help you
(I'll ask the customer to do 'show image' and 'show calls' tomorrow. He had
allready gone home today)
Sven-Olof
invocation block 0
Entry Address: SHARE$OBB$SHR+772272
invocation block 1
Entry Address: SHARE$OBB$SHR+771400
invocation block 2
Entry Address: SHARE$OBB$SHR+761520
invocation block 3
Entry Address: SHARE$OBB$SHR+767168
invocation block 4
Entry Address: SHARE$OBB$SHR+766504
invocation block 5
Entry Address: SHARE$OBB$SHR+760544
invocation block 6
Entry Address: SHARE$OBB$SHR+761152
invocation block 7
Entry Address: SHARE$OBB$SHR+759520
invocation block 8
Entry Address: SHARE$OBB$SHR+396656
invocation block 9
Entry Address: TESTSRVMAIN\main
invocation block 10
Entry Address: TESTSRVMAIN\_main
invocation block 11
Entry Address: 2360942752
|
| 1400.3 | | LEMAN::DONALDSON | Froggisattva! Froggisattva! | Thu May 15 1997 03:07 | 3 |
| Shouldn't you upgrade to 2.7-11?
John D.
|
| 1400.4 | | RULLE::KLASSON | Sven-Olof Klasson @GOO | Thu May 15 1997 11:34 | 12 |
| Sorry, I been busy the whole day with another urgent problem and
have not had the time to call this customer today. So I don't have any
more information today. I hope I can get it tomorrow.
> Shouldn't you upgrade to 2.7-11?
I have read thru the release notes for V2.7-11. None of problem
fixes described seems to match this problem.
Do you still V2.7-11 could fix this problem?
Sven-Olof
|
| 1400.5 | More info... | RULLE::KLASSON | Sven-Olof Klasson @GOO | Fri May 16 1997 05:05 | 119 |
| Hi,
Here is the info.
- TEST.IDL
- TEST.IML
- Output from "show image" and "show calls" in the debugger
Sven-Olof Klasson
Ps I have sent V2.7-11 to the customer. He will install it and see if it helps
----- TEST.IDL ---------------------------------------------------------------
module PDATEST
{
interface TEST
{
void Send(in string to,
in string subject,
in string message)
context("PDALOTS.*");
};
};
#pragma interface_id( "PDATEST::TEST", "7c957a42c70b.0c.0d.05.00.00.00.00.00")
#pragma operation_id( "PDATEST::TEST::Send", "7c957a42c70c.0c.0d.05.00.00.00.00.00", 1)
----- TEST.IML ---------------------------------------------------------------
// *******************************************************************
// Created Tue May 13 15:55:47 1997 by OBB V2.7-10 (COMPILE/GENERATE)
// *******************************************************************
//
// OBB Default IML file
// ---------------------
//
// Use this file as a base for your additional IML definitions.
//
implementation TESTImpl
{
activation_type ( program );
activation_string ( "run utv:[tla.temp.lots.test]testsrvmain" );
implementation_identifier ( "7c957a42c70b.0c.0d.05.00.00.00.00.00" );
registration_attribute string ImplementationName = "TESTImpl";
method_dispatcher_routine TESTImpl__dispatch ();
registration_routine TESTImpl__register ();
deactivate_impl_routine TESTImpl__notify ();
Send ( )
implements ( PDATEST::TEST::Send )
invoke_builtin ( "TESTImpl_Send" )
;
};
----- "show image" and "show calls" ------------------------------------------
show image
! image name set base address end address
!
! CMA$TIS_SHR no 0032A000 0032E1FF
! CODE0 8049E000 8049EDFF
! DATA1 0032A000 0032A9FF
! DATA2 0032C000 0032C1FF
! DATA3 0032E000 0032E1FF
! DBGTBKMSG no 006BC000 006C8FFF
! DEBUG no 0058E000 0069E9FF
! DECC$MSG no 006A8000 006A93FF
! DECC$SHR no 0013C000 002BDBFF
! CODE0 80566000 806831FF
! DPML$SHR no 002BE000 00328FFF
! CODE0 804A0000 805645FF
! DATA1 002BE000 002F45FF
! DATA2 002F6000 00307DFF
! DATA3 00308000 003083FF
! DATA4 0030A000 003261FF
! DATA5 00328000 00328FFF
! LIBOTS no 00052000 000581FF
! CODE0 8048E000 8049CBFF
! DATA1 00052000 000545FF
! DATA2 00056000 00057BFF
! DATA3 00058000 000581FF
! LIBRTL no 0005A000 0013B5FF
! CODE0 80400000 8048DDFF
! OBB$AGENT_CLIENT no 00A06000 00A669FF
! OBB$COSSHR no 00330000 003703FF
! OBB$MSG no 006AA000 006BA1FF
! OBB$PRVSHR no 007EA000 0084C068
! OBB$SECURITY no 00716000 007771FF
! OBB$SHR no 00418000 0055B3FF
! OBB$TRANSPORT_DNET no 00788000 007E89FF
! OBB$TRANSPORT_TCP no 0084E000 008AE9FF
! SECURESHR no 003D6000 004167FF
! CODE0 8069E000 806AD3FF
! SECURESHRP no 00372000 003D47B8
! CODE0 80684000 8069CFFF
! SHRIMGMSG no 006A0000 006A69FF
! SYS$SSISHR no 0055C000 0058C3FF
!*TESTSRVMAIN yes 00010000 000503FF
! UCX$ACCESS_SHR no 00932000 009F2BFF
! UCX$IPC_SHR no 008B0000 009303FF
!
! total images: 23 bytes allocated: 759944
show calls
! module name routine name line rel PC abs PC
! SHARE$OBB$SHR 00000000 004D4A08
! SHARE$OBB$SHR 00000000 004D4864
! SHARE$OBB$SHR 00000000 004D1F80
! SHARE$OBB$SHR 00000000 004D37D0
! SHARE$OBB$SHR 00000000 004D33F0
! SHARE$OBB$SHR 00000000 004D1BB0
! SHARE$OBB$SHR 00000000 004D1DF8
! SHARE$OBB$SHR 00000000 004D1704
! SHARE$OBB$SHR 00000000 00478E34
!*TESTSRVMAIN 24246 000002D0 000303B0
!*TESTSRVMAIN __main 000000AC 000300AC
! 00000000 8CB921F8
set nolog
!%DEBUG-E-SYNTAX, command syntax error at or near 'NOLOG'
EXIT
|
| 1400.6 | | REQUE::BOWER | Peter Bower, ObjectBroker | Mon May 19 1997 10:23 | 6 |
| The call stack indicates that the value for filtering context
properties is invalid. This value is created in the generated
dispatcher and is a static value. Could you get the generated
dispacter file and the commands used to compile and link the server ?
|
| 1400.7 | V2.7-11 does not fix this | RULLE::KLASSON | Sven-Olof Klasson @GOO | Tue May 20 1997 08:49 | 9 |
| Hi Peter,
I will soon have the files you requested. The customer will send
them by mail to me.
The customer tried with Objectbroker v2.7-11. It did not fix the
problem.
/Sven-Olof
|
| 1400.8 | More info | RULLE::KLASSON | Sven-Olof Klasson @GOO | Tue May 20 1997 10:35 | 24 |
| Hi,
Re: .6
Here is the info. I attach compile and link commands.
TESTDISPATCH.C was too big (180 Kbyte) to include here, you can copy the file
from RULLE""::RULLE$TEMP:[KLASSON.4060_OBB_HAGGLUNDS]TESTDISPATCH.C
/Sven-Olof
COMPILE.COM
===========
$ copts := /nomember/prefix=all/include=(pda_refcopy,decw$include)/warn=disable=(boundadj,cddattr,unsupptype)
$ if P2 .nes. "" then copts = "''copts'''P2'"
$ cc/noopt/debug'copts 'P1
LINKTESTSRV.COM
===============
$ link/debug TESTSRVMAIN,TESTDISPATCH,TESTMETHODS,-
ORB_BASEFUNCS,PDA_BASEFUNCS,sys$input/opt
sys$share:obb$shr/share
sys$share:obb$cosshr/share
sys$share:decc$shr/share
|