| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1356.1 |  | HPSTEK::XIA | In my beginning is my end. | Thu Dec 13 1990 14:01 | 15 | 
|  |     Take Laplace transform, you get:
     2
    s Y(s) + 3sY(s) + 2Y(s) = 10sU(s) + 3U(s)
    
    Then you get:
    
            (10s + 3)
    Y(s) = ------------ U(s)
            (s+1)(s+2)
    
    Now you got to tell us what u(t) is and then, hopefully, you can figure
    out what U(s) is, then it becomes a matter of splitting the rational
    and take the inverse Laplace transform.
    
    Eugene
 | 
| 1356.2 |  | ALLVAX::JROTH | Saturday alley up to Sunday street | Thu Dec 13 1990 17:33 | 14 | 
|  |          <<< Note 1356.1 by HPSTEK::XIA "In my beginning is my end." >>>
>    Now you got to tell us what u(t) is and then, hopefully, you can figure
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    out what U(s) is, then it becomes a matter of splitting the rational
>    and take the inverse Laplace transform.
    I see you're not an engineer :-)
    u(t) is the unit step function most likely.  Note that you have to
    specify the initial conditions on y(t) to make a unique solution.
    Beyond that, it's a plug-in homework problem.
    - Jim
 | 
| 1356.3 |  | HPSTEK::XIA | In my beginning is my end. | Fri Dec 14 1990 13:00 | 7 | 
|  |     Uh... Jim,  I have a B.S. degree in EE.  :-)  In control classes (where
    most of those things come up), u(t) usually stands for some arbitrary
    linear input (ok, maybe my memory is a bit rusted).  You are right, we
    need to know y(0).  In my solution, I just assumed that y(0)=0, and it
    is a standard "plug&chug" homework problem.
    
    Eugene
 | 
| 1356.4 | check out the Schaums Outline for more help | ALLVAX::JROTH | Saturday alley up to Sunday street | Fri Dec 14 1990 15:08 | 17 | 
|  |          <<< Note 1356.3 by HPSTEK::XIA "In my beginning is my end." >>>
>    Uh... Jim,  I have a B.S. degree in EE.  :-)  In control classes (where
   Hah!  You could have fooled me, you've used some mathematics-sect
   jargon at times that no engineer would be caught dead using :-)
   Re .0
   There's an inexpensive Schaums outline on the Laplace Transform that
   I recommend - you might want to check it out to supplement your course.
   It will really clarify the ideas.
   [For introductory math many of the outlines are really excellent - can
    hardly beat the prices either!]
   - Jim
 |