| Title: | Mathematics at DEC | 
| Moderator: | RUSURE::EDP | 
| Created: | Mon Feb 03 1986 | 
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 2083 | 
| Total number of notes: | 14613 | 
   As part of a more general problem I needed to prove the following:
   	(xi are positive reals, i = 1 to n)
        if Product(xi) is fixed
   	then Sum(xi) attains its least value when the xi are equal.
   Can anyone supply a proof? I'm sure I shall blush when someone provides a
   simple one.
   For n=2 it follows immediately from:
   	(x1 + x2)^2 = 4*x1*x2 + (x1 - x2)^2
   Dick
    
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1263.1 | TRACE::GILBERT | Ownership Obligates | Mon Jul 02 1990 14:18 | 10 | |
| Suppose there are two unequal xi. Without loss of generality, call them x1 and x2. replacing them with x1' = x2' = sqrt( x1 x2 ) leaves the product unchanged, but reduces the sum of the xi, viz: 0 < (x1 - x2)^2 (since they're unequal) 0 < x1^2 - 2 x1 x2 + x2^2 4 x1 x2 < x1^2 + 2 x1 x2 + x2^2 4 x1 x2 < (x1 + x2)^2 2 * sqrt( x1 x2 ) < x1 + x2 x1' + x2' < x1 + x2 | |||||
| 1263.2 | ALLVAX::JROTH | It's a bush recording... | Mon Jul 02 1990 15:31 | 18 | |
|      Another standard way for this class of problem is via Lagrange
     multipliers.
     To minimize S = SUM(x[i]) subject to PROD(x[i]) = C, minimize instead
	S + L*(PROD(x[i])-C),	over the x's and L, the Lagrange multiplier.
     Taking partial derivatives with respect to the x's gives
	1 + L*(PROD(x[i]))/x[j] = 0, j = 1,2,...
	x[j] = -L*C, j = 1, 2, ...
     Which implies that the x's are equal at the constrained extremum.
     Still, I like the proof in .1 much better.
     - Jim
 | |||||
| 1263.3 | Paul Erdos (sp?) would approve! | IOSG::CARLIN | Dick Carlin IOSG, Reading, England | Tue Jul 03 1990 10:11 | 2 | 
|     Many thanks, Peter. A very neat proof. 
    
 | |||||