| Title: | Mathematics at DEC |
| Moderator: | RUSURE::EDP |
| Created: | Mon Feb 03 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2083 |
| Total number of notes: | 14613 |
I'm not sure if this is the right conference but seeing that my
problem is math-related I'll try.
I work is personnel and perform demographic studies on populations
within DEC. I follow such things as hiring, terminations, retirements,
growth, and internal movement. I have a few questions/problems
on how things are currently calculated and wanted to get some opinions
to either back my ideas or prove me wrong. There are two main areas
that I need feedback on:
1)
For hiring, termination, or retirements: the rates are currently
calculated as:
New Hires or New Terms or New Retire
------------------------------------ = Hiring, Term, or Retire Rate
Average Population (Prev+Present/2)
This doesn't make sense to me for some reason. I think that the
denominator should be the base population only:
New Hires or New Terms or New Retire
------------------------------------ = Hiring, Term, or Retire Rate
Previous (base) population
2)
Measuring internal movement within a population (termed Churnover)
is a highly debated topic. Not many people agree on a method.
I can't even describe the present method. Right now Churnover is
calculated by:
(position change + group change - overlap figure - new hires)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Average Population
I, myself, have no great idea on how to measure 'internal movement'.
I hope that some people may have some ideas. My closest guess
(simplistic) would be:
Int. transfers into Pop. + Hires + Int. trans. out + Term + Ret
---------------------------------------------------------------
Previous (Base) Population
If anyone has any ideas, or other notes conferences to turn to please
let me know.
Thank you for your help,
Don
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1014.1 | $$?? | AKQJ10::YARBROUGH | I prefer Pi | Wed Jan 18 1989 11:50 | 41 |
> For hiring, termination, or retirements: the rates are currently
> calculated as:
>
> New Hires or New Terms or New Retire
> ------------------------------------ = Hiring, Term, or Retire Rate
> Average Population (Prev+Present/2)
>
> This doesn't make sense to me for some reason. I think that the
> denominator should be the base population only:
>
> New Hires or New Terms or New Retire
> ------------------------------------ = Hiring, Term, or Retire Rate
> Previous (base) population
For a very large company it probably doesn't matter which formula you use,
but for a startup the latter version blows up (division by zero), so it
makes sense to stick with the first version.
> ... Right now Churnover is
> calculated by:
>
> (position change + group change - overlap figure - new hires)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Average Population
>
> I, myself, have no great idea on how to measure 'internal movement'.
> I hope that some people may have some ideas. My closest guess
> (simplistic) would be:
>
> Int. transfers into Pop. + Hires + Int. trans. out + Term + Ret
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Previous (Base) Population
By definition the internal transfers in and out should be identical. I
assume what is important is the processing cost of each change in job, and
an internal transfer therefore costs roughly twice as much as a new hire.
However, I must admit that I don't know what you are trying to measure and
for what purpose, and I don't know what all the terms mean, so I don't have
much to add.
Lynn Yarbrough
| |||||