|  |     Re .0:
    
    Consider that if you are far enough away from any configuration with a
    net charge (that is, a total charge that is not zero), the field is
    hard to distinguish from the field due to a charge at the center of the
    configuration (where the center is computed for the charges in the same
    way that centers of masses are computed).  The field varies closely
    with the inverse square of distance, and the components of the field
    that do not vary inversely with the square are small with respect to
    the size of the entire field.
    
    But if the total charge is zero, the normally dominating component (the
    unipole moment) is also zero.  In this case, the configuration may be
    modeled with a dipole.  The strength of the field varies inversely with
    the cube of distance, and other components are drowned out at
    sufficient distances.  (If the dipole moment turns out to be zero, you
    can go on to the quadrupole moment, and so on.)
    
    So, at sufficient distances, the more complex moments are not
    important.  But at moderate distances, you might model the
    configuration as a unipole with a dipole to make it more accurate than
    a unipole alone.  To find the dipole moment of the first configuration,
    first find its unipole moment (a charge of Q at (.2,.2)).  Then add the
    inverse of the unipole (a charge of -Q at the origin) to the
    configuration to remove it.  Then find the dipole moment of the new
    configuration. 
    We can find an estimate of the field for several dipoles by considering
    each dipole separately, finding its field, and adding the fields.  If
    the sum of fields of dipoles looks like a single field of a different
    dipole, then the configuration can be modeled with a single dipole.  I
    would guess this is the case, but I am too lazy to check it out at the
    moment.  If so, you can find the dipole moment just by finding the
    dipole moments of the individual dipoles and adding them (as vectors).
    This is the same as finding the dipole moment of a dipole consisting of
    the total negative charge at the center of the negative charges and the
    total positive charge at the center of the positive charges. 
                                                                
				-- edp
 |