| Title: | Mathematics at DEC | 
| Moderator: | RUSURE::EDP | 
| Created: | Mon Feb 03 1986 | 
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 | 
| Number of topics: | 2083 | 
| Total number of notes: | 14613 | 
I had a problem published in the current issue of the Journal of Recreational Mathematics (volume 16, number 2) that I devised with the help of a computer: Problem 1292: a) For some n, partition the first n perfect squares into two sets of the same size and same sum. b) For some n, partition the first n triangular numbers into two sets of the same size and same sum. c) For some n, partition the first n perfect cubes into two sets of the same size and same sum. d) For some n, partition the first n perfect fourth powers into two sets of the same size and same sum. This problem is still "open" if you want to send your solution in to them.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.1 | HARE::STAN | Wed Feb 15 1984 11:43 | 24 | ||
| A more general result was published as a problem in the January issue
of the American Mathematical Monthly 91(1984)57.
Problem E3032, proposed by J. O. Shallit:
Let d and r be integers with d>1 and r>0. Let p be a polynomial
with real coefficients and deg(p)<r. Show how to partitiion the set
	S = { p(0), p(1), p(2), ... , p(d^r-1) }
into d disjoint subsets whose union is S, such that the sum of each
subset is the same.
---------------------------------
Now in my problem, p(x) was (x+1)^n, so the above result says that
the first 2^3=8 squares can be partitioned into two sets with the same sum;
the first 2^4=16 cubes can be partitioned into two sets with the same sum;
the first 2^5=32 4th powers can be partitioned into two sets with the same sum;
the first 2^6=64 5th powers can be partitioned into two sets with the same sum;
Of course, Shallit's result says nothing about whether this number is
minimal.  It also doesn't require the sets to each have the same cardinality.
But it's a nice result anyhow.
 | |||||
| 9.2 | HARE::STAN | Wed Feb 15 1984 12:09 | 14 | ||
| From:	METOO::YARBROUGH    15-FEB-1984 12:06
To:	HARE::STAN
Subj:	5th powers
Stan;
 5    5   5  5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5
3  +4  +7  +8  +9 +11 +12 +13 +17 +21 +22 +23
                      =
 5    5   5  5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5
1  +2  +5  +6 +10 +14 +15 +16 +18 +19 +20 +24
		Lynn Yarbrough
 | |||||
| 9.3 | METOO::YARBROUGH | Wed Feb 15 1984 13:53 | 21 | ||
|     2   2   2   2     2   2   2   2
a) 1  +4  +6  +7   = 2  +3  +5  +8
b) T1 + T2 + T6    =  T2 + T4 + T5
   (1 +  6 + 21    =   3 + 10 + 15)
    3    3    3    3    3     3     3    3    3    3     3     3
c) 1  + 2  + 4  + 8  + 9  + 12   = 3  + 5  + 6  + 7  + 10  + 11
    4  4  4  4  4   4   4   4   4   4  4  4  4   4   4   4   4   4   4
d) 1 +2 +3 +6 +9 +10 +14 +19 +20 = 4 +5 +7 +8 +12 +13 +15 +16 +17 +18
finally, 
 5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5
1  +2  +5  +6 +10 +14 +15 +16 +18 +19 +20 +24
                      =
 5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5   5
3  +4  +7  +8  +9 +11 +12 +13 +17 +21 +22 +23
	- Lynn Yarbrough
 | |||||
| 9.4 | HARE::STAN | Wed Jan 16 1985 04:35 | 11 | ||
| Kenneth M. Wilke outdid us all in his published solution
in vol 17, issue 2 of JORM:
He found one single partition of the first 32 positive integers
that simultaneously solved all 4 parts of my problem:
{1,4,6,7,10,11,13,16,18,19,21,24,25,28,30,31}
{2,3,5,8,9,12,14,15,17,20,22,23,26,27,29,32}
A neat hack!
 | |||||