| Title: | |
| Created: | Wed Nov 15 1989 | 
| Last Modified: | Wed Dec 31 1969 | 
| Number of topics: | 0 | 
| Total number of notes: | 0 | 
    
    There's an advert, in a fortnightly magazine called "SOLDIER", from a 
    group looking for land on which they can re-enact battles. There's
    nothing new in that I know, but this group call themselves, "The
    Vietnam Re-enactment Society".  
    
    Am I being too sensitive, because they make me feel sick.
    
    Dave 
    
    
    
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 158.1 | I agree with you | DPDMAI::HYDE | Rdb �ber alles OKO 487-2256 | Wed Mar 27 1991 18:47 | 17 | 
|     I, for one, agree with you.  Re-enacting battles should serve some
    historic purpose.  The most important battles in the Vietnam War
    occurred in Washington, DC.  That's where the no-win policy was
    formulated and soldiers who tried to win, such as Lt Calley and General
    LaVelle, were disposed of by a bunch of bureaucrats.  
    
    I'd gladly participate in a re-enactment of one of Pres Johnson's
    Cabinet Meetings.  I hereby volunteer to play the role of Robert [very] 
    Strange MacNamara (Sec of Def) or Dean Rusk (Sec of State). 
    
    I haven't seen the ad (we Colonists drop the vert) you're referencing,
    but I'm a bit suspicious of monetary purposes rather than historic
    purposes in many recent activities for Vietnam era vets.  Does the ad
    state where the proceeds will go?
    
    
                                          Kurt
 | |||||
| 158.2 | CRISPY::NASHD | Thu Mar 28 1991 09:48 | 6 | ||
|     Kurt,
    
    There is no mention of any beneficiaries from this group.  
    
    
    Dave
 | |||||