| Title: | Computer Integrated Telephony |
| Notice: | Tuning guidelines in Notes:36.13/36.17-Performance 287.* |
| Moderator: | LINGO::BEDENHAM |
| Created: | Wed Jan 18 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Feb 21 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 631 |
| Total number of notes: | 2581 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 405.1 | Not Access I'm afraid | HEART::DIDCOCK | Tue Jan 05 1993 18:21 | 6 | |
| 405.2 | Why is PSI required for Compucall? | DELNI::MBURKE | Tue Jan 05 1993 19:02 | 4 | |
| 405.3 | Compucall requires diff. lower layer protocol | HEART::DIDCOCK | Wed Jan 06 1993 13:25 | 10 | |
| 405.4 | Compucall and PSI | DELNI::MBURKE | Wed Jan 06 1993 16:35 | 1 | |
| 405.5 | Another Compucall question | DELNI::MBURKE | Thu Jan 07 1993 22:36 | 10 | |
| 405.6 | HEART::JOHNSTON | Emerald. | Fri Jan 08 1993 10:15 | 13 | |
| 405.7 | Why not send the call directly? | HEART::DIDCOCK | Fri Jan 08 1993 11:32 | 14 | |
| 405.8 | I love being the Amarex liason! | DELNI::MBURKE | Fri Jan 08 1993 16:45 | 17 | |
| 405.9 | same company? | HEART::DIDCOCK | Fri Jan 08 1993 18:37 | 7 |