| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 5843.1 | | BIGUN::nessus.cao.dec.com::Mayne | A wretched hive of scum and villainy | Tue Mar 25 1997 23:17 | 7 |
| You can't. If you have two segments, you need two subnets, or you need a bridge
(in which case you aren't routing).
You could subnet your class C, but I'm told that Windows NT can only route
between A, B, and C class networks, so that wouldn't work either.
PJDM
|
| 5843.2 | Could I segment a class-c block | TAINO::JRIVERA | | Wed Mar 26 1997 06:29 | 22 |
| Hi!
I'm a little confuse here you said -
>>> You could subnet your class C,
>>> but I'm told that Windows NT can only route
between A, B, and C class networks, so that wouldn't work either.
If Windows NT could route a class c subnet and We have an entire
class-c block.
Question:
If I have a class-c block could I segment this block in 2 or 3
subnet using the subnet-mask ?
And if so could I then put both cards in the same class-c block but
with different subnetmask to indify the segment to wich the card
belogns and route ip within both segments?
Josepc
|
| 5843.3 | | SMURF::PBECK | Who put the bop in the hale-de-bop-de-bop? | Wed Mar 26 1997 07:14 | 6 |
| A class C network can be subnetted. But if (as .1 indicates he has
heard) NT only supports routing between "full" networks and not
between subnets within a Class (A, B, or C) network, then it
wouldn't help your problem.
|
| 5843.4 | | TAINO::JRIVERA | | Wed Mar 26 1997 07:27 | 31 |
| Could I then put them in the same class-c network but each card in
different segments and everybody could then see everybody?
If I put each card as a gateway to the router.
Example:
Workstation(A) Server NT 4.0
10BaseT
(1.1.1.10) -------- NIC(1)
Gateway(1.1.1.1) (1.1.1.1)
NIC(2) 100BaseT Workstation (B)
(1.1.1.2)---------------(1.1.1.11)Gway(1.1.1.3)
\
\ Router
\------------(1.1.1.3)-----Internet
Could everybody see the internet with this setup?
|
| 5843.5 | Don't think so... | ALFSS1::HENRY | Bob Henry | Wed Mar 26 1997 08:33 | 17 |
| I probably shouldn't jump in since I'm not really a networking expert
but I don't think this will work. I don't know the whole story here
but wouldn't it be easier to put in a 10/100 bridge/switch? In order
for this to work the way you've drawn it, I think you'll need to
allocate a block of ip
addresses (with the appropriate subnet mask) on the 10baseT side and
then route between the 2 segments/subnets.
NT will route between subsets of a
subnet (if that makes any sense); this is how an isp sells blocks of ip
addresses to small offices or home lans. I've connected several of
these for people using either dial-up networking with modems or isdn
adapters back to the isp. You have to do some trickery with the route
table but it works. Most NT networking books (Mark Minasi's comes to
mind) or the 4.0 server resource kit will give you some examples.
Good luck,
|