| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1103.1 | Alter your perceptions... | MISERY::WARD_FR | Going HOME--as an Adventurer | Thu Nov 08 1990 10:56 | 31 | 
|  |     re: .0 ("Madame X")
    
         Statistics are deceptive, as you know.  If I were to hang around
    bars all day I would say that the world consists of barflys.  If
    I were to hang around a garage all day, I'd say that everyone has 
    a car and that everyone's car has problems.  If I were to hang around
    a dental office all day I'd say that no one keeps their teeth in 
    good shape.  Etc., etc., etc.  The point is, these studies came from
    the clinics where the majority of the patients are homosexual or
    bisexual men.  This is not a cross-section of the entire world.
    My personal world knows a couple of homosexual men, vast sweeping
    majorities of heterosexual men, and only perhaps two men in my 
    life so far that I have confirmed as bisexual.  Obviously there are
    more, yet from my view of reality my truth is different than that
    which your "studies" reveal.
        To paraphrase an anecdote, sometime during World War I a reporter
    went out to the farm country in Iowa (or someplace) and approached a
    farmer and asked him his opinion of the war.  He said, "What war?"
    When told that much of the world was fighting, he replied, "Well,
    they certainly picked some beautiful weather for it."
        Reality is subjective...objectivity lies within that.  How do
    you wish to see reality?  To what do you align yourself?
    Even if what the article said were "true," apparently I find myself
    aligning with the "other 50%."  Bisexuality is a nice theory for
    me, and cosmically I can agree.  Pragmatically, thus far in my life,
    I have not agreed with that.  I can understand many of the rationales
    cited, and even agree with them, but again, I choose the other 50%.
    You're choosing the reality you live in...which reality is it?
    
    Frederick
    
 | 
| 1103.2 |  | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Nov 08 1990 11:57 | 18 | 
|  | I noticed that nowhere in the text was there any justification for the
"50%" claim.  The author appeared to pluck it out of thin air.  Certainly
makes for sensationalistic reading, doesn't it?  As .1 remarked, the only
data presented is related to known partners of those engaged in 
homosexual activity.  It's quite an imaginative leap from that to drawing
conclusions about all males.
I find the notion that men who went to all-male schools "quite likely"
engage in homosexual behavior to be rather ridiculous.  Some do,
undoubtedly, but it's no more likely than you'd find in the general
population.
I'd feel sorry for any woman who took any of this article seriously, except
perhaps the part about knowing your partner and not taking his history
for granted.  This should apply to anyone regardless of their sexual
orientation.
					Steve
 | 
| 1103.3 |  | TERZA::ZANE | Consciousness before being -- V. Havel | Thu Nov 08 1990 12:03 | 12 | 
|  | 
   I find it hard it take this article seriously.  It's sensationalistic
   with a lot of half-truths wound up in truisms.  I'm also not convinced of
   the "great barrier" between men and women being that most men want sex
   without emotional attachment whereas most women want the emotion.  I've
   heard that many times in many places as the sort of generalized notion
   that "everyone knows."  Sorry, but that has not been my experience and I
   find it hard to believe generally.  I'm not saying there are not men
   *and* women like that, I just find it hard to believe generally.
   							Terza
 | 
| 1103.4 |  | AIMHI::RAUH | Home of The Cruel Spa | Thu Nov 08 1990 12:14 | 4 | 
|  |     Remember that this info is based upon info gathered in another part of
    the globe. I agree with the most of you about it having any truth, but
    it is another societys view about its own men and not based upon alot
    of men in the Northeast
 | 
| 1103.5 | Ho hum | YUPPY::DAVIESA | She is the Alpha... | Thu Nov 08 1990 12:18 | 5 | 
|  |     
    I used to read Cosmopolitian.
    I don't any more.
    This article reminded me *why* I don't.
    'gail
 | 
| 1103.6 | A Part of One Man's Story | SAGE::GODIN | Naturally I'm unbiased! | Thu Nov 08 1990 12:25 | 24 | 
|  |     Well, nothing like a dissenting opinion, is there?  I TAKE THIS ARTICLE
    SERIOUSLY, though I would hope that the 50% figure is somewhat high.
    
    I'm basing my belief on the life experiences of my uncle, an
    out-of-the-closet gay truck driver, as he recorded them on a day to day
    basis during his truck driving career.  By his own count -- and as
    recorded on tapes I now have in my possession, he had sex on an almost
    daily basis with multiple partners, the vast majority of whom were
    nameless and faceless to him, men he encountered in truck stops, bus
    stops, parks, restaurants, theaters, peep shows, and highway rest areas 
    all across the US.  Even if he hadn't recorded the marital status of 
    some of his partners, I would have begun to suspect after a while that 
    at least some of them were married, and probably to unsuspecting wives.  
    Anonymity was the name of his game, and when you're anonymous, anything 
    goes.
    
    The tragedy is that even after he began to suspect he carried the HIV 
    virus, he continued having these encounters.  He died of AIDS last
    August.
    
    This is just one man's story, but I doubt he's unique.  How common is
    he?  Are you willing to bet your life on your answer?
    
    Karen 
 | 
| 1103.8 |  | TERZA::ZANE | Consciousness before being -- V. Havel | Thu Nov 08 1990 13:15 | 13 | 
|  | 
   Hi Karen,
   I would not dispute your uncle's experiences or his story.  I would not
   overlook the tragedy of his having contracted the AIDS virus.
   I would dispute the generality of the article.  Of those people who were
   surveyed, I would not doubt their experiences.  I do have trouble
   applying those experiences to the majority of people everywhere.
   							Terza
 | 
| 1103.9 |  | ARRODS::CARTER | Treat me like I'm a bad girl... | Fri Nov 09 1990 03:47 | 42 | 
|  | I knew two gay men at University, both of whose experiences were the same 
as Karens uncle.  They had picked up men, anonymously, all over the place.
One of them once came back from a trip to London and said that during his
hitchhike back to Stirling (about 400 miles) he had been given a lift by 4
men and had had sex with 3 of them.  Maybe that just says something about
the type of people who pick up hitchhikers... but what do you bet some of them
are married/have girlfriends.  
This was before the AIDS thing, it worries me that gay men like Karen's uncle
continue to pick up men after knowing they have HIV,,,
I too discounted the statistics (Lies, lies and damn lies) and in fact cut out
some of the statistics when typing it in (they purported that only 50% of the 
population are "heterosexual" and of those about 50% have had/are having casual
gay sex).
What worried me was the "emotional detachment" angle, the fact that these men
could see these occasional "flings" as nothing more than a bit of fun.  I have 
known quite a few men who see casual flings with women in this way, so why 
should it be any different with a man?
The article I believe makes out that a lot of men are not "lying" they are just
ommiting the truth.
What the press over here is saying is that Gay men are changing their sexual
habits, but that heteosexual people are not.  The implication from this article
is that there are a lot of men who consider themselves heterosexual and 
therefore are not changing their habits as Gay men are.
The other thing that stikes me in discussing this is that we can NEVER know
if the statistics are true.  By the fact that the very men who are being 
discussed wouldn't admit to casual gay sex anyway.  I find myself looking about
at the number of men I know and thinking well "some of them must have".  As far 
as I can see the report gets its statistics in reverse, in other words its
Gay men and Bisexual men saying they've had casual sex with "heterosexual" men
.... none of these so called heterosexuals have "given evidence".
Xtine
 
 | 
| 1103.11 | Connection between sex and love | IE0010::MALING | Life is a balancing act | Fri Nov 09 1990 17:15 | 9 | 
|  | Ignoring all the statistics, I found the statement about the connection between
sex and love interesting.  I'm not a man, but I have always seen them as two
separate things which can occur together or separately.  I even believe its
possible for a person to be sexually attracted to one sex and emotionally
attracted to the other sex.
How do the rest of you think about the connection?
-Mary
 | 
| 1103.12 |  | NRUG::MARTIN | White Camaro?--AHAHAHAHAHAH | Fri Nov 09 1990 18:10 | 2 | 
|  |     Actually Mike, I found it more along the lines of Oprah or Sally
    myself.....
 | 
| 1103.14 | yes, there's lots of anonymous sex going on between males | HANNAH::OSMAN | see HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240 | Mon Nov 12 1990 10:55 | 20 | 
|  | 
There definitely is alot of anonymous sex going on between males.
I attend group meetings in the Boston area in which people are dealing with
quite a range of relationship, emotional, and sexual issues.
Many people, particularly men, talk about their anonymous sexual
experiences, which they carried on in places such as highway rest areas.
The group meetings for relationship and sexual issues are open to anyone that
has heir own issues in those areas, but people are VERY strict about
anonymity and confidentiality within the group.  hence out of the meetings,
no one tells someone else's particular story, or even names someone that
was at the meeting.
Hence people are willing to reveal their private issues, knowing that
listeners won't betray the person.  In other words, the meetings become
a "safe space".
/Eric
 | 
| 1103.15 |  | ARRODS::CARTER | Treat me like I'm a bad girl... | Thu Nov 15 1990 09:56 | 12 | 
|  |     Out of interest,
    
    I've discussed this with several people now... and something I believe
    is missing from my previous replies is that the statistics/"facts" were
    extrapolated from interviews with Gay men, not the heterosexuals...
    
    ie. it was the Gay men saying that their "anonymous" partners were
    heterosexual/married men... rather than the researchers finding
    heterosexuals "admitting" this behaviour....
    
    
    Xtine
 | 
| 1103.16 | Wanted: a source for unbiased statistics | SAGE::GODIN | Naturally I'm unbiased! | Thu Nov 15 1990 12:02 | 6 | 
|  |     Agreed, Xtine.  The only problem is, it's a biased result either way. 
    But I, too, would like to see the results of candid interviews with
    heterosexual/married men.  My own gut tells me that the numbers would
    still be higher than many of us would think.
    
    Karen
 | 
| 1103.17 | smut magazine of the third kind | DEC25::BERRY | The SIMPSONS are back! | Wed Nov 21 1990 09:36 | 3 | 
|  |     
         Cosmoplitan is written to entertain women.  It's a joke.
    
 | 
| 1103.18 |  | ESIS::GALLUP | It's a Wildcat weekend! | Mon Nov 26 1990 14:25 | 12 | 
|  |     
    
    
    >     Cosmop[o]litan is written to entertain women.  It's a joke.
    
    
    Actually, it entertains the men in my household more than me.  I buy it
    every once in awhile to get ideas for designs (clothing) and the guys
    pour over the issues avidly.
    
    k
    
 | 
| 1103.19 |  | TRACTR::HOGGE | Dragon Slayer For Hire...Crispy! | Wed Dec 05 1990 18:59 | 9 | 
|  |     The thing that strikes me is that all of the info was volunteered...
    
    Something about that sticks in my mind from another article I'd read 
    somewhere... that "volunteered" info tends to strech reality in stats.
    
    Why is my brain more fuzzy then usual....I wish I could recall the 
    details or figure out why this is sticking in my mind...
    
    Skip
 |