| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1318.1 | What about the locking especially ? | NOMAHS::SECRIST | Rdb WWS; [email protected] | Mon Mar 24 1997 18:48 | 6 | 
|  |     
    I'm especially interested in the locking aspects of '.0.
    
    Regards,
    rcs
    
 | 
| 1318.2 |  | UKVMS3::PJACKSON | Oracle UK Rdb Support | Tue Mar 25 1997 06:01 | 5 | 
|  |     If they don't specify anything then Visual Basic will probably use the
    ODBC default of automatically committing whenever possible. This would
    explain the 'softlocking' the customer is seeing.
    
    Peter
 | 
| 1318.3 | This is logical without a SET TRANSACTION, isn't it ? | NOMAHS::SECRIST | Rdb WWS; [email protected] | Tue Mar 25 1997 15:31 | 6 | 
|  |     
    Thanks, Peter.  Has anybody seen the "lock everybody out of every
    record I touched" behavior from VB ?
    
    Regards,
    rcs
 | 
| 1318.4 |  | UKVMS3::PJACKSON | Oracle UK Rdb Support | Wed Mar 26 1997 05:20 | 7 | 
|  |     >Thanks, Peter.  Has anybody seen the "lock everybody out of every
    >record I touched" behavior from VB ?
    
    Not really, but that is the behaviour I would expect with explicit
    transaction control.
    
    Peter
 |