| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 866.1 | Names | KYOA::CHANG |  | Thu Mar 25 1993 09:06 | 18 | 
|  |     
    I hope your due date was a typo - 2/7/93 - your wife is REALLY
    overdue!!  I'm guessing that you meant 4/7/93.
    
    I reread the original note and Elliott was a favorite name at the
    time.  Using the four, Elliott, Stuart, Samuel and William, I came
    up with the following:
    
    William Stuart Dinsdale (My favorite)
    William Elliott Dinsdale (WED are initials-don't know if that's a 
    			       problem)
    Samuel Elliott Dinsdale
    Elliott Samuel Dinsdale
    Elliott William Dinsdale
    
    Have you already gone through these?
    
    Chris
 | 
| 866.2 | Stuart William or Stuart Jeffrey...? | AMCUCS::MEHRING |  | Thu Mar 25 1993 18:49 | 22 | 
|  | David,
Of those 3 names, I like Stuart the best with James...
How about:
	Stuart William Dinsdale
	Stuart David Dinsdale
	Stuart Kevin Dinsdale
	Stuart Joseph Dinsdale
	Stuart Timothy Dinsdale
	Stuart Jeffrey Dinsdale
	or
	
	Samuel David Dinsdale
	Adam Stuart Dinsdale (other way would be SAD)
	Richard William Dinsdale
Good luck,
-Cori		
 | 
| 866.3 | mmmmmm...maybe two middle names ?? | SHIPS::DINSDALE_D | Demon Tester | Fri Mar 26 1993 16:27 | 29 | 
|  |     
    Re .1
    
    Thanks Chris, Julie isn't in fact overdue, its the difference in date
    conventions between the UK and the US. The baby is due 2nd July 93 !!!!
    
    We like the idea of William Stuart a lot, so that probably get s the
    place as bench mark against which others will be tested. Trouble is,
    using this methods, the bench mark becomes familiar, so any new
    suggestion seem that much more unusual.
    
    By the way, Elliot has lost favour -  Julie is a teacher (5-7 year
    olds) and a less than favorite pupil is currently Elliot Pain - Pain by
    name and nature !!
    
    
    Reading .2, I start to think that maybe Stuart does sound better with 
    James. The other danger with William is that it gets shortened to Willy 
    (which I hate) or Bill which sounds much older
    
    Maybe including David in the middle is nice, we dont plan for any more
    after this one, perhaps two middle names.
    
    What do you think ?
    
    Thanks
    
    Dave 
    
 | 
| 866.4 | my vote | GLITTR::WARREN |  | Sun Mar 28 1993 14:31 | 2 | 
|  |     William David.
    
 | 
| 866.5 | My vote goes to ... | PEKING::SMITHS2 | The Pink Pedaller! | Mon Mar 29 1993 06:21 | 5 | 
|  |     
    Stuart David is my favourite.
    
    Sam
    
 | 
| 866.6 | William David Stuart Dinsdale | KYOA::CHANG |  | Mon Mar 29 1993 09:24 | 21 | 
|  |     
    I forgot about the dating conventions differences.  Thanks for
    correcting me.
    
    If you are thinking about 4 names and are apprehensive about William,
    how do these sound:
    
    Stuart David William Dinsdale
    Stuart William David Dinsdale
    
    In the case of William becoming Billy, I have noticed that once a 
    nickname is used it often remains.  So if you and your wife agree
    to Bill and use it from the beginning, there is a very good
    chance it will remain.  Then you can consider:
    
    William David Stuart Dinsdale
    
    I think that is my favorite so far.  Of course, this is just my
    opinion.
    
    Chris  
 |