| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 337.1 | Goof | STUBBI::REINKE |  | Tue May 27 1986 14:45 | 1 | 
|  |     Sorry this was supposed to be an answer to #327 on Bester.
 | 
| 337.2 | However... | INK::KALLIS |  | Tue May 27 1986 14:47 | 15 | 
|  |     First, a clarification:  I _Like_ _The Stars My Destination_ very
    much.
    
    However, having said that, science-fiction it ain't.  A good and
    rather powerful story; however, it has things that are scientific
    absurdities, such as rubble following in Gully Foyle's "wake" when
    he was stranded in space, and the "Burning Man" burning _in a vacuum_.
    
    Sorry, a good story, but a fantasy.
    
    You want something closer to SF from Bester, try _The Demolished
    Man_.
    
    Steve Kallis, Jr.
    
 | 
| 337.3 | ans to 337.2 | STUBBI::REINKE |  | Mon Jun 09 1986 17:13 | 4 | 
|  |     Agreed - however, I was about 16 when I first read it. I thought
    it was a great story and wasn't particularly aware of the
    non-scientific parts at the time. It did get me interested in SF
    as a genre, scientific goofs or not.
 | 
| 337.4 | 8^) | EDEN::KLAES | It obstructs my view of Venus! | Wed Jun 11 1986 18:11 | 2 | 
|  |     	Wouldn't it be ironic if Bester lived in Worcester?
    
 | 
| 337.5 | "Tenser said the Tensor" | TROLL::RUDMAN |  | Tue Jun 17 1986 00:35 | 5 | 
|  |     Y'know, Mr. Kallis, it is surprising that so few (it seems) have
    read THE DEMOLISHED MAN.  I believe I cut some of my SF teeth on
    that one.  Some of the best can still be found in the book swaps.
    
    						Don
 | 
| 337.6 | in praise of "The Demolished Man" | PROSE::WAJENBERG |  | Tue Jun 17 1986 08:35 | 7 | 
|  |     I like "The Demolished Man" very much.  I was tickled by the idea
    of blocking a telepath with a "mindscreen" consisting of an inane
    jingle you can't get out of your head, and I thought the society
    depicted was very convincing.  Of course, I read it several years
    ago -- I might see more holes now.
    
    Earl Wajenberg
 | 
| 337.7 | I also liked TSMD -- see above | SUPER::KENAH | On a Blue Jaunte | Tue Jun 17 1986 13:35 | 20 | 
|  |     < re: Note 337.5 by TROLL::RUDMAN >
    
    >  Y'know, Mr. Kallis, it is surprising that so few (it seems) have
    >  read THE DEMOLISHED MAN.  I believe I cut some of my SF teeth on
    >  that one.  Some of the best can still be found in the book swaps.
    
    Not all that surprising... when I first got interested in SF, one
    of the collections I bought was "The Hugo Winners", edited by Isaac
    Asimov.  This collection listed Hugo winning works from 1953 onward.
    
    "The Demolished Man" won the Hugo for Best Novel in 1953.  "Fine,"
    I said, "I'll go out and buy me a copy of TDM." No way. It was out
    of print.  I tried the swap shops. Nope, it had been out of print
    for a LONG time.  They finally re-released it about six years after
    I first learned about it.  
    
    So it doesn't surprise me that many haven't read TDM -- it's hard
    to read a book you can't find.
    
    					andrew
 | 
| 337.8 | ???.4 | TWEED::REINKE |  | Wed Jun 18 1986 16:54 | 3 | 
|  |     .4 please explain???? (this is from Stubbi::Reinke but Stubbi is
    sick today)
    
 | 
| 337.9 | WARNING!! WARNING!! PUN | OLIVER::OSBORNE | John D. Osborne | Thu Jun 19 1986 13:36 | 9 | 
|  | re: Note 337.8 
>    .4 please explain????
    
It's a pun. (and a rather dreadful one at that)
Consider that Wocester is sometimes, especially around here, pronounced
Worst-er. (or WOO-ster, or War-chest-ter, or WATCH-ster...)
JO
 | 
| 337.10 | punishment | STUBBI::REINKE |  | Thu Jun 19 1986 16:19 | 1 | 
|  |     BESTER-WOO-ster.......................aaaaaaargh!!!!sorry I asked!
 | 
| 337.11 | Eight, Sir! | TROLL::RUDMAN |  | Wed Jul 16 1986 23:32 | 7 | 
|  |     Re. .7:  You've got my curiosity up.  My copies are from the mid-/late
    sixties (no pub. date).  Assuming a re-release in the '70s, you
    started S F ~1970?  Anyway, I think it'll hold up, even  after 33
    years.  Maybe you're not frequenting the right stores.  Have you
    tried The Book Bear and The Shire?
    
    							Don
 | 
| 337.12 | MORE PUNISHMENT! | EDEN::KLAES | It's only a model! | Thu Aug 14 1986 14:37 | 4 | 
|  |     	It would appear that Mr. Reinke has become a demolished man!
    
    	:^)
    
 | 
| 337.13 | No, I'm not from Worcester. | TROLL::RUDMAN |  | Thu Aug 14 1986 17:55 | 8 | 
|  |     I'm sure you were kidding with the pronunciation.  Commercials have
    been messing up for years.
    
    To set the record straight (remember the last time you read *that*
    phrase in here? :-)) Worcester is pronounced like the Woo in Wookie
    or would--Wou-ster.   Barbarians.
                      
    						Don
 | 
| 337.14 | I lived in Worcester once... | HECTOR::RICHARDSON |  | Fri Aug 15 1986 13:01 | 1 | 
|  |     And Leicester is pronounced "Lester", while you're out at.
 | 
| 337.15 | Mr.?? | STUBBI::REINKE |  | Fri Aug 15 1986 19:13 | 5 | 
|  |     re .12
    'smile when you say that....
    I was a woman last time I checked
    Have your kept up with reading intros? try 122.37
    :-)
 | 
| 337.16 | probable cause of confusion: | CGHUB::CONNELLY | Eye Dr3 - Regnad Kcin | Fri Aug 15 1986 21:12 | 5 | 
|  | > < Note 337.15 by STUBBI::REINKE >
...
>    I was a woman last time I checked
Don used to go by that node-address!  (hi, Don)
 | 
| 337.17 | re names confusion | STUBBI::REINKE |  | Fri Aug 15 1986 21:22 | 4 | 
|  |     Yeah - I know - things have been a little better since he moved
    to Tweed, but we still get each other's mail
    He says hi back - are you Paul Connelly?
    Bonnie
 | 
| 337.18 | NEW TYPE OF SEX CHANGE OPERATION? | EDEN::KLAES | Avoid a granfalloon. | Mon Aug 18 1986 11:14 | 5 | 
|  |     	Obviously you were such a demolished man that you turned into
    a woman.  Amazing!
    
    	:^)
    
 | 
| 337.19 | Does anyone know where I can get a copy? | ANNECY::BOURDILLON | Cats are the next step in evolution | Thu Mar 31 1994 04:50 | 6 | 
|  | Copy of The Stars My Destination, that is.
Any help would be very gratefully received
Ben
 |