|  |     
    1)
    ATM host  SVC  ATM switch  PVC  ATM switch  PVC  ATM switch  SVC ATM host
            --------         --------        ---------        --------
    
    No.  To use SVC's at the endpoints, there has to be a signalling path
    all the way through.  If the middle switch supported it, you might be
    able to use a virtual path to link the two end switches.
    
    
    2) ATM host  LANE  ATM switch  CIP  ATM switch  CIP  ATM switch  LANE  ATM
    host
           ----------        ---------        ---------        ----------
    
    Again, no.  If the hosts are getting IP connectivity via LANE, there
    would have to be an IP router between the LANE based subnet and a
    subnet that was using classical IP.
    
    	/gary
    
    
 | 
|  | 
>   1)
>   ATM host  SVC  ATM switch  PVC  ATM switch  PVC  ATM switch  SVC ATM host
>          --------         --------        ---------        --------
>    
>    No.  To use SVC's at the endpoints, there has to be a signalling path
>    all the way through.  If the middle switch supported it, you might be
>    able to use a virtual path to link the two end switches.
I remmember that the signalling be doing by the host, when I setup the ATM
host
I should do "atmsig up ..." in alpha. So, if I have this alpha attached on 
endpoints switches, work?
Thanks,
eric 
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
 | 
|  | 
Signalling on the two Alpha hosts is necessary, but not sufficient.  As the
previous reply pointed out, in order to set up SVCs between two hosts, all
of the ATM switches between these two hosts must support signalling, and/or
trunking of VCCs (including the signalling VCC) over a virtual path.
 |