| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 208.18 |  | CALS::THACKERAY |  | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:37 | 8 | 
|  |     So, the 5 cylinder design is inherently out of balance.
    
    Then why is it that my Audi 5000S 5-cyl is one of the smoothest cars
    I've ever driven (except for my V12 Jag, of course!)?
    
    Now that raises an interesting question: how do Jag set up their V12?
    
    Ray
 | 
| 208.19 |  | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Tue Jun 09 1992 17:07 | 9 | 
|  |     .18�    Then why is it that my Audi 5000S 5-cyl is one of the smoothest cars
    .18�    I've ever driven (except for my V12 Jag, of course!)?
    
    There are several ways to make an engine run smoothly. One is to fit a
    big heavy flywheel, another one is to fit a damper on the crankshaft,
    third is to use the famous japanese counter rotating shafts, etc ....
                                                     
    What is smooth ? at what rpm ?  A V12 can sustain 400rpm (and sometimes
    less) without vibration. The 5 cyl can't do that.
 | 
| 208.20 | 5's | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Mon Jun 15 1992 09:55 | 3 | 
|  | Ahhh Gi'day...�
      Mine can sustain 7300 without vibration. Better than the BMW 4's
 | 
| 208.21 |  | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Mon Jun 15 1992 10:50 | 5 | 
|  |     Manufacturers tend to do a good job at balancing engines for high rpm.
    It's at low rpm (when idle) that you'll surely recognise the problem.
    
    .20�      Mine can sustain 7300 without vibration. Better than the BMW 4's
    
 | 
| 208.22 | Mines good all through the range, not like the VR6 | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Mon Jun 15 1992 10:58 | 4 | 
|  | Ahhh Gi'day...�
    The point  was that I'm not worried about 400 rpm when you have another
    6900 to play with. What will the Jag V12 (production) top out at?
 | 
| 208.23 | Audi rules OK ? | SKIWI::EATON | Marketing - the rubber meets the sky | Thu Jun 18 1992 03:23 | 2 | 
|  | Mine is fine too. A little off-beat when at idle which I don't mind at all. A bit
like a bent-8 actually...
 | 
| 208.24 | Is it true? | SUBURB::POWELLM | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be! | Thu Nov 12 1992 13:41 | 11 | 
|  |     
    	I heard that a Diesel is inherently smoother as the revs rise,
    whilst a petrol engine is inherently rougher.  Certainly the converse
    is true at low revs. Anyone out there know the truth of this?  I have
    the impression that this would be irrespective of the number of
    cylinders, being a generalisation.
    
    	I'm NOT asking for opinions in this!  I am just interested if
    anyone has real facts about this.
    
    				Malcolm.
 |